Shrink Wrap Packaging Experts - We Do It Right!

How we reduced a Companies stretch film usage by 68% while improving their containment force

Many assume that using more film means better containment. But in reality, piling on extra layers often leads to waste, higher costs, and little improvement in load stability.

At Impak, we have a team of experts who can conduct stretch wrap audits with cut & weigh tests, tilt and vibration tests, and more, to help you optimize your stretch wrapping operations.

In this case study, we will go over how we optimized a customer’s stretch wrapping operations with the AXIS Lean 80 Gauge Stretch wrap, in turn reducing their total stretch film usage by 68%, while improving containment strength, lowering costs, and future-proofing their stretch wrapping operations.

A pallet stretch wrapped and on a conveyor.

Challenge: Improving the stretch wrapping process for damage-free shipping

Two pallets with very different load profiles were delivered to our warehouse for our team of experts to test. The first pallet was tall and irregular, holding products of varying sizes, and the second was shorter and more uniform, with evenly stacked products. These pallets were being wrapped with a semi-automatic stretch wrapper at nominal tensions. Both pallets looked to have been poorly wrapped, with numerous punctures and tears in the film. . This was due to an excessive amount of stretch wrap applied, combined with significant inboard distance between the pallet edge and the product, which left the loads unstable, wasteful, and vulnerable to damage during transit.

OPTIMIZE

We needed to find a way to optimize their stretch wrapping operations, from the type of stretch wrap they should use to and any additional materials needed.

PALLET 1 - TALL & IRREGULAR

Excessive amount of film, cardboard top sleeve does not match the contour of the product beneath it​.

Tearing and punctures appear to be from handling and transit, primarily forklift damage and abrasion damage from an external source (another skid)​.

Product appears to be undamaged from the transit to our facility. However, there appears to be some load shift of the smaller coils stacked at the top of the load.

PALLET 2 - SHORT & UNIFORM

Punctures appear to be from both handling damage and from the current film being stretched over sharp corners. All 4 corners had film punctures.

Punctures at the corners of the pallet are likely due to the dramatic inboard distance from the pallet corner to the product.

The difference between the forklift puncture and the corner puncture are visible here. One did not cause the other.

Our Approach: Testing, Auditing & Process Optimization

To start, we needed to know all we could about the load containment so that we could provide a solution. That meant measuring the weight of the pallet overall, and each section of the pallet, as well as the cut & weigh.

A cut & weigh test measures exactly how much film is being used to wrap a load. When a pallet is wrapped, a section of the film is cut off and weighed, which reveals the true film consumption in ounces. These tests are used to identify waste and to set a baseline for improvement.

Pallet 1 – SPECIFICATIONS
Gross Pallet Weight 1436 lbs
Top 4.62 lbs
Middle 14.88 lbs
Bottom 9.25 lbs
Cut & Weigh 25.07 oz
Pallet 2 – SPECIFICATIONS
Gross Pallet Weight 1226 lbs
Turntable Speed 7.25 lbs
Turntable Size N/A
Weight Requirements 5.10 lbs
Maximum Load Size 7.7 oz

The next step was a tilt and vibration test to see how both pallets would currently hold up in transport. The current methods of stretch wrapping proved to be insufficient. Both pallet tests resulted in containment failure. If the load had been exposed to any additional forces, damage to the product was certain, and the potential for injury may have been possible.​

 

Pallet 1

  • The stretch film tore at the pallet corners on the side opposite the tilt.
  • The wrap pulled up one of the pallet boards, which exposed nails and a sharp edge.
  • Inside the load, the products weren’t tight; there were gaps and movement, which caused the load to shift.

Pallet 2

  • The film tore at the pallet corners and continued ripping during the test until it completely detached from the pallet.
  • Once the film failed, the load slid off the pallet, and only the sled kept the products from fully separating.
  • The load shift was caused by three main issues: the film failure at the punctured corners, low friction between product layers that caused uneven sliding, and the load being positioned too far in from the pallet edges, which amplified the movement once it began.

Axis Lean 80 GaugeAnti-Slip SheetsStrappingOptimized Wrap Pattern

 

Our team of experts reviewed our lineup of stretch wrap and decided that the best course of action was to switch the customer’s current conventional 80 gauge stretch wrap to our
Axis Lean 80 Gauge high-performance stretch film known for its:

  • High Load Containment
  • High Puncture Resistance
  • Excellent Clarity with High Cling
  • Lowest Cost Per Load / Wrap

We also added to both pallets anti-slip sheets to inhibit movement, strapping to unitize the load, and optimized the wrap patterns for consistency and efficiency.

To start, we needed to know all we could about the load containment so that we could provide a solution. That meant measuring the weight of the pallet overall, and each section of the pallet, as well as the cut & weigh.

A cut & weigh test measures exactly how much film is being used to wrap a load. When a pallet is wrapped, a section of the film is cut off and weighed, which reveals the true film consumption in ounces. These tests are used to identify waste and to set a baseline for improvement.

Pallet 1 – SPECIFICATIONS
Gross Pallet Weight 1436 lbs
Top 4.62 lbs
Middle 14.88 lbs
Bottom 9.25 lbs
Cut & Weigh 25.07 oz

Pallet 2 – SPECIFICATIONS
Gross Pallet Weight 1226 lbs
Turntable Speed 7.25 lbs
Turntable Size N/A
Weight Requirements 5.10 lbs
Maximum Load Size 7.7 oz

The next step was a tilt and vibration test to see how both pallets would currently hold up in transport. The current methods of stretch wrapping proved to be insufficient. Both pallet tests resulted in containment failure. If the load had been exposed to any additional forces, damage to the product was certain, and the potential for injury may have been possible.

Pallet 1
  • The stretch film tore at the pallet corners on the side opposite the tilt.
  • The wrap pulled up one of the pallet boards, exposing nails and a sharp edge.
  • Inside the load, there were gaps and movement, which caused the load to shift.

Pallet 2
  • The film tore at the pallet corners and continued ripping until it fully detached from the pallet.
  • Once the film failed, the load slid off the pallet, and only the sled prevented full separation.
  • The load shift was caused by low friction between layers, the film failure, and the load being set too far in from the pallet edges.

Axis Lean 80 Gauge
Anti-Slip Sheets
Strapping
Optimized Wrap Pattern

Our team of experts reviewed our lineup of stretch wrap and decided that the best course of action was to switch the customer’s current conventional 80 gauge stretch wrap to our
Axis Lean 80 Gauge high-performance stretch film known for its:

  • High Load Containment
  • High Puncture Resistance
  • Excellent Clarity with High Cling
  • Lowest Cost Per Load / Wrap

We also added to both pallets anti-slip sheets to inhibit movement, strapping to unitize the load, and optimized the wrap patterns for consistency and efficiency.

Results: Reduced film used while improving load stability

The final stage of our stretch wrap optimization was to validate the improved setup in real-world conditions.

We rewrapped both pallets using AXIS 80 Gauge high-performance film, added the strapping, and anti-slip sheets to stabilize the loads.

Since the customer used a Wulftec SML-150 Turntable Pallet Wrapper, we replicated their setup in our warehouse. With the same machine on-site, our team performed multiple in-house test wraps to ensure the updated process delivered consistent, failure-free results.

After numerous tests, we visited the customer’s warehouse to have them try out this new stretch wrapping process on their machine, and it performed flawlessly. The results were consistent, stable, and fully aligned with their operational needs.

Pallet Comparison — Collapsible

Pallet 1 Comparison

Gross Weight: 1,436 lbs
Film ↓ ~84% (25.7 oz → 4.1–4.4 oz) Top Containment ↑ >3× (4.62 → 15.5 lbs)
Containment & Film Use
Metric Before After
Top Containment (lbs) 4.62 15.5
Middle Containment (lbs) 14.88 15.6
Bottom Containment (lbs) 9.25 9.00
Cut & Weigh (oz) 25.7 4.1–4.4
Optimized with AXIS 80ga, strapping on both axes, anti‑slip sheet, and a shaped top sheet.

Pallet 2 Comparison

Gross Weight: 1,226 lbs
Film ↓ ~52% (7.7 oz → 3.7–3.9 oz) Top Containment ↑ >2.7× (7.25 → 20.15 lbs)
Containment & Film Use
Metric Before After
Top Containment (lbs) 7.25 20.15
Middle Containment (lbs) — —
Bottom Containment (lbs) 5.10 10.50
Cut & Weigh (oz) 7.7 3.7–3.9
Optimized with AXIS 80ga, strapping on both axes, anti‑slip sheet, and a shaped top sheet.

Reduced Film Usage

Film consumption dropped significantly on both loads, Pallet 1 was reduced by over 84% (from 25.7 oz to just over 4 oz), while Pallet 2 saw a 52% reduction (from 7.7 oz to 3.9 oz). In turn reducing their overall film usage by 68%.

Heightened Load Security

By adding strapping, anti-slip sheets, and custom top sheets, internal shifting and product separation were completely eliminated. As a result, both pallets moved from being classified as unstable (C-load) to fully secure and transport-ready.

Increased Containment Force

Containment strength increased by 247% on Pallet 1 and by 30% on Pallet 2, despite both using dramatically less film than before. Not only were the loads more stable, but the improvements were achieved without added material, labour, or equipment changes.

Improved Safety & Performance

The optimized wrap process eliminated film tearing, corner punctures, and shifting altogether. The loads remained fully intact with no sliding or separation, reducing damage risk, improving safety, and ensuring more reliable pallet transport.

416-299-0960
Contact Us Today!
Looking to Improve your Stretch Wrapping Operations?

Just give us a call or send us a message with the form below. One of our customer service representatives would be happy to help you with whatever you need.

Impak Packaging Gertex Group Logo
Impak Packaging

110A Iron St.
Etobicoke, Ontario
M9W 5L9
Phone: 416-299-0960
Fax: 416-299-0961
Email: info@impakpackaging.com

Inquiries

416-299-0960

Parts and Service

416-299-0960

Search for products